EVALUATION OF CEMENT-RETAINED VERSUS SCREW-RETAINED FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RECONSTRUCTIONS


  • O. Cheptanaru State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • N. Cretu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • N. Bajurea State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • S. Melnic State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • C. Postaru State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • D. Uncuta State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova
  • N. Chele State University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Nicolae Testemitanu”, Kisinev, Republic of Moldova

Abstract

EVALUATION OF CEMENT-RETAINED VERSUS SCREW-RETAINED FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RECONSTRUCTIONS

References

1. Andrẻ P. Saadoun , Esthetic Soft Tissue Management of Teeth and Implants, First Edition, 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p 117-139.



2. Buser D. et al., Stabiliy of Contour Augmentation and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant-Supported Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: 3-Year Results of a Pro-spective Study With Early Implant Placement Postextraction. Journal of Perio- dontology. 2011. v. 82,nr. 3, p.342-349.



3. Gallucci G O, Grutter L, Nedir R, Bischof M, Belser UC. Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-mettal and all-ceramic singleimplant crowns. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22,2011; 62- 69.
Published
2017-12-29
How to Cite
Cheptanaru, O., Cretu, N., Bajurea, N., Melnic, S., Postaru, C., Uncuta, D., & Chele, N. (2017). EVALUATION OF CEMENT-RETAINED VERSUS SCREW-RETAINED FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED RECONSTRUCTIONS. Biological Markers in Fundamental and Clinical Medicine (scientific Journal), 1(4), 23-24. https://doi.org/10.29256/v.01.04.2017.escbm08
Section
Selected abstracts

Most read articles by the same author(s)